Sociology’s Ethical Compass: A Study of ASA Presidential Addresses

Derek Robey, Harvcard University
Shai Dromi, Harvard University
Kelly Liu, Harvard University

This study analyzes 117 American Sociological Association presidential addresses to examine how perspectives on appropriate sociological research have changed over time. Each speech was coded based on the types of justifications used to guide the field, or "moral repertoires." The most common repertoires justified research based on its methodological rigor in measuring social phenomena, contributions to civic values and social betterment, and relevance to public interests. Patterns in the frequency and tone of each repertoire reveal periods of consensus and debate. While methodological rigor was most frequent, values like civic betterment and public relevance also featured prominently. Emphasis shifted between eras, suggesting evolving views on legitimate sociology among ASA leaders. This analysis delineates different phases in visions for the discipline and core ethical concerns characterizing each period.

No extended abstract or paper available

 Presented in Session 159. Institutions and Morality